There is a new story circulating today that a former assistant—Paul
Re: Armstrong doping question
Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:04:20 -0500
"Pat" <P...@newstime.com>

This is a guy who lives in Europe, but nevermind that. As I understand it, you admit you resent Lance for winning the TDF. Oh, and nevermind the other races he rides in. They don’t count. Only the ones he wins count. Yeah, I understand.—Pat

Ah, I see. So absurd anti-European generalisations from an American is fair comment, but scepticism from a European about a cyclist who happens to be American is prejudice. Thanks for clearing that up.—Just

I don’t recall giving any "anti-European generalisations". Show me where. I merely responded to you saying that he "parachutes" in to win the one race a year he rides. That statement is not true, and you know it. You wrote it, though. He does live in Europe most of the year and trains in Europe. To me, that is not "parachuting" in.—Pat

Nope. What I said was, if he /is/ unpopular with European pro cyclists, then the fact that he takes the trophy in the most famous cycle race in the world without "paying his dues" in the minor races would account for it without the need to invoke any nationalism at all.

And the other thing I said was, Eddy Merckx was (is) the greatest cyclist who ever lived. And I stand by that. You seem to think that preference for Merck is indicative of pro-European bias. You have a lot to learn about Europe. If you think the French hate the Americans, you should hear what they think about the English, Germans, Flemings and so on. In fact there is more animosity between French and Flemish speakers in Belgium than between most people of different nationalities.—Just

Glad you cleared that up. It sounded as if you were resenting him because of the "parachuting in" sentence. Have you noticed, though, that he does participate in minor races?—Pat