There is a new story circulating today that a former assistant—Paul

►

and lance has already denied it on the air, saying that the guy wanted $500,000 to "go away". doesn’t sound very credible to me.—Dennis

►

Never.—Mark

►

This is a toughie. Turd density drugs aside.—bikeguy11968

►

Can’t argue with THAT logic!—Bill

►

Re: Armstrong doping question
3 Apr 2005 00:20:22 -0800
mmdir2...@yahoo.co.uk

Why not he reveal his medical record so that we can see what kind of anti-cancer chemo he takes. And he should reveal his personal doctor. Current anti-doping method is not effective. The medial test lab is trying to improve better way to find the doping espcially when you are dealing with the guy know about the drug and the body chemistry. Lance is a trained body chemistist and knows how to get away from the doping than most peopl could. No matter Lance keeps total innocent, there is always a hole to escape.—mmdir2...

He’s done with chemotherapy. Do you think he takes an anti-cancer vaccine, or something? Your troll attempts are pathetic. —Gooserider

He doesn’t have to reveal anything to you. He has done so to the proper authorities and they are satisfied. He owes you nothing. He is not taking any anti-cancer drugs. You would know that if you would get a copy of his books and read---not just speculate.—Pat

Chartreuse Poof expert on holes.

(Nice relapse re. English language, BTW.)

Again, he’s given permission to authorities to KEEP HIS SAMPLES indefinitely. When better testing methods are developed, they can try again and again to find something.

Sure doesn’t SOUND like a cheater to me. (Compare his plain-spoken denials to the tap-dancing baseball players are /still/ doing; nice to see a man get right out there, and not hide behind publicists, lawyers, agents, etc.)

Shoeless Bill—Bill

they can try again —Mike

I lost track of this thread, so I don’t know if anybody posted this:

<printemp.net>

It’s the 51pg Third Answer and Second Counterclaim in the Anderson v. Armstrong suit. Interesting stuff within....—Neil

I hadn’t heard that. Would you happen to have a citation or rough date handy? I’m not doubting you. I just would like to read more.—Mike