There is a new story circulating today that a former assistant—Paul
Re: Armstrong doping question
Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:07:06 -0700
Mark Hickey <>

How do we know you’re not a pedophile? There are lots of ’em out there that we don’t know about, after all. Why should we give you the benefit of the doubt instead of just assuming you ARE a pedophile? Better to just let it be known that you are a pedophile since you spend a lot of time on the computer (since other computer users have been found to be pedophiles).

Hope that puts your "logic" in perspective.

Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles <habcycles.c> Home of the $695 ti frame—Mark

Re: Armstrong doping question
Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:38:41 -0500
"Mike Kruger" <>